CyQuantiFi vs CYE
CYE brings a strong offensive-security heritage: its Hyver platform maps attack surfaces and exploitable paths, with cloud-posture depth added through acquisition. CyQuantiFi shares the attack-graph foundation but optimises for a different end point — a defensible dollar figure across every asset, including the ones an attack-surface scan can't reach.
At a glance
| Capability | CYE | CyQuantiFi |
|---|---|---|
| Attack-surface / exposure analysis | ✓ Strong | Focused |
| Dollar-based CRQ (FAIR / ALE) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Unscannable-asset quantification | — | ✓ |
| Expert calibration (accuracy scoring) | — | ✓ |
| Correlated / supply-chain risk (Threat Tide) | — | ✓ |
| Sovereign AU hosting / ANZ depth | — | ✓ |
Comparison based on publicly available product positioning as at July 2026.
Where CYE is strong
CYE's roots are in offensive security, and it shows in Hyver's ability to map an organisation's attack surface and prioritise the paths an attacker could actually exploit. With added cloud-posture capability, it's a capable choice for teams whose primary need is understanding and reducing technical exposure, particularly across cloud and internet-facing assets.
Where CyQuantiFi is different
Attack-surface analysis needs something to scan. OT/SCADA, air-gapped and legacy assets don't offer that — we quantify them with expert consensus.
We track expert accuracy over time so the dollar figure carries a defensible confidence range, not just a point estimate.
Australian-owned and hosted, with SOCI CIRMP and CPS 234 mapped natively for regulated ANZ buyers.
Choose the right fit
Your priority is mapping and reducing technical attack surface, especially across cloud and internet-facing systems.
You need a defensible dollar figure across your whole estate — including OT and air-gapped assets — with sovereign hosting and ANZ regulatory depth.
Frequently asked questions
Is CyQuantiFi an alternative to CYE?
For organisations whose primary need is a dollar-based risk figure rather than attack-surface mapping, yes. CyQuantiFi covers scannable and unscannable assets, adds calibrated confidence and correlated-risk modelling, and offers sovereign Australian hosting.
What's the difference between attack surface management and cyber risk quantification?
Attack surface management identifies what's exposed and exploitable. Cyber risk quantification estimates what that exposure would cost — a dollar Annual Loss Expectancy — so you can prioritise by financial impact, not just technical severity.
From exposure to dollars
Book a scoping call and see your whole estate quantified — including the assets a scan can't reach.
More comparisons
CYE and Hyver are trademarks of their respective owner. This comparison reflects CyQuantiFi's view of publicly available product positioning as at July 2026 and is provided for information only.